Skip to content


What Comes First, the Nitro or the IV?

95 comments

In comments to my last EMS Newbie post, reader 40Lizard commented on the discussion Ron Davis and I had on this episode of Confessions of an EMS Newbie:

Funny you should mention starting an IV before giving NTG- we’ve been having that discussion in class this week- and the general consensus is that unless we are SuperMedic and can have divine intuition on how the pt is going to react to the NTG- we’d better have a line in place before giving it! :)

Um, no offense to you, 40Lizard, but… horse shit.

Allow me to tell you a little tale about a patient I had some years back. We were called to the local nursing home for a patient with respiratory distress. We get there, and find a lady who weighs about three hundred pounds, parked on a chair in front of the air conditioner, oxygen mask strapped to her face at – unusual for a nursing home – an appropriate flow rate of 8 liters per minute.

Now, the lady has really exaggerated air hunger, and from across the room she sounded like a washing machine with the top left open. She’s diaphoretic as hell, and I don’t know who had the more desperate look on her face; the patient, or the LPN attending her.

Now, for you experienced medics out there, this presentation is probably just screaming “CHF! CHF!” in big red, flashing letters, and you’d be right. That’s exactly what was wrong.

She had decided to celebrate her recent discharge from the hospital (for CHF exacerbation, oddly enough), by treating herself to a pound of salted pistachios.

Obviously, this did not prove to be a good idea.

Her heart rate was 140, blood pressure 240/120, and respirations of 40, all with an oxygen saturation of 78% on 8 LPM oxygen. She was obviously tiring, and had that, “I’m about to pass out and you’re going to be picking my large butt off the floor” look about her, so the first thing I did was get her on our cot.

My partner, being the quick-thinking type, was already setting me up an albuterol nebulizer. Unfortunately, she was quickly thing the wrong things, but she can’t really be faulted for doing what she was taught. Lots of EMTs (and nurses and ER docs, I might add) think that albuterol cures all respiratory ailments.

I shook my head and ordered, “Nitro.”

She gave me a quizzical look, but gave me the spray bottle of Nitro anyway. The nurse gave me a nervous look and said, “Um, she hasn’t complained of chest pain…”

I ignored them both, lifted the lady’s face mask and told her to lift her tongue… and promptly delivered a triple squirt of sublingual nitroglycerin spray.

Both the LPN and my partner nearly fainted dead away. But they recovered, and managed to help me load the patient in the rig. I repeated that triple dose of Nitro three more times on the way to the ED. After the last dose, I noticed was getting close to our destination, and decided an IV might be in order, you know, to keep the nurses happy. So I managed to get a 22 gauge in her hand (and it pains me to admit I stuck something that small), and I was still taping it down when my partner opened the rear doors of the rig.

Inside, the receiving ER doc turned out to be none other than our service medical director, a man with whom I’ve taught many an ACLS class. We’ve got that whole absolute trust thing going on, but it really wouldn’t have mattered if it had been another doctor.

So I give him the basic rundown, “CHFer, just got out of the hospital today, celebrated by eating a big salty bag of pistachios. Looks like flash pulmonary edema. Initial BP was 240/120 and sat was 78% on 8 liters, but I’ve been hitting her with the Nitro all the way in, and her BP is down to 160/90, and her sats are 100% now. Breathing a lot easier, too.”

“Any Lasix?” he wanted to know.

“Nope,” I shook my head, “didn’t figure it was a priority, and I just got my line as we pulled up anyway.”

“I agree,” he nodded. “How much Nitro did you give her?”

And that’s when I hesitated.

“Um,” I hedged, “how much Nitro did I give her, or how many times did I give her Nitro?”

He cocked an eyebrow at me quizzically, put on his Medical Director Face, and said, “How about you tell me both.”

So I swallowed hard, and admitted, “I gave her four rounds of Nitro… 1.2 mg at a time.”

He kept that same quizzical expression on his face and said, “You know that’s not in the protocol. And you felt comfortable triple-dosing her with Nitro, without an IV?”

Oh well, if I go down, might as well go down swinging.

“Very comfortable,” I affirmed. “She didn’t need Lasix or fluids, she needed vasodilation. And if a certain medical director I know would push the company to adopt a CPAP protocol, she’d have had that, too.”

He laughed and said, “Well, she’ll have BiPAP as soon as respiratory gets down here, and if that medical director had any pull with the corporate bean counters, a certain ‘I’d rather beg for forgiveness than ask for permission’ medic I know would have had it to play with. Now get your ass back to work.”

**********

The previous anecdote was merely intended to demonstrate that, indeed, lots of Nitro can be safely administered without an IV, and you need not be Supermedic to know when it can be done. All you need do is assess your patient.

I know of medics who devoutly believe that an EMT-B should never assist a patient in taking prescribed nitroglycerin tablets. I don’t know if it’s just protecting medic turf or some baseless superstition about precipitously dropping BP with one or two doses of Nitro, but it’s probably a little of both. And it’s just as wrong as the notion that EMS personnel should never administer more than three doses of Nitro before consulting with medical control.

First of all, the three dose limit on Nitro is something that cardiologists instruct their patients. It doesn’t apply to us. It is simply a trigger for calling 911, in the event that the patient’s chest pain turns out to be more than stable angina.

The end point of Nitro dosing for EMS personnel should be relief of symptoms, or a systolic BP approaching 90 systolic. Period. That applies whether you’re an EMT-B assisting a patient with their Nitro, or a medic administering it yourself. And honestly, if you’re a medic, you probably still need to be giving it to your MI patients, even if you’ve achieved adequate pain relief with opiates. I know the Mayo Clinic studies suggest that Nitro mainly makes us feel better, not the patient, but they are not yet the standard of care.

Secondly, cardiologists apparently believe it is safe to prescribe to their patients who presumably will not have an IV when they take it. Heck, it’s rare enough that they even know their blood pressure before that pop that little white pill under their tongue.

The only time you need be concerned with obtaining an IV before you give Nitro is when the BP is low or borderline, or the patient is suffering from a right ventricular infarction.

A 12-lead EKG takes about 30 seconds to obtain. If it indicates an inferior wall infarction, do a 15-lead EKG (or a second 12-lead with lead V4R). That’s another 30 seconds to determine if your patient is having an RVI or not. If that happens to be the case, you might need to start an IV before you administer Nitro.

I emphasize the word might, because RVI is not an absolute guarantee of preload dependency. If the patient is truly preload dependent, and thus prone to a precipitous drop in BP from relatively small doses of vasodilators like Nitro, there will generally be other clinical signs that point to that fact.

Look for things like orthostatic weakness, syncope or hypotension, and look for Kussmaul’s Sign.

Normally, when you see significant jugular venous distension in a heart patient, you’d expect to hear wet lungs to some degree. Also, JVD usually decreases with the negative intrathoracic pressure of inspiration.

The jugular venous distension in Kussmaul’s Sign does just the opposite: it worsens (or stays the same) with inspiration, and it’s usually present with dry lungs. This is a hallmark sign of impaired reight ventricular filling, and a big clue that vasodilation with Nitro may result in you having your patient flat on his back with his legs in the air, cursing the fact that you didn’t get an IV while they still had a blood pressure.

But it doesn’t take Supermedic to figure that out, it just takes assessing your patient. And it ain’t really all that common anyway.

  • http://sixlettervariable.blogspot.com Christopher

    We have paste and spray. CHF’ers get sprays then paste once CPAP is applied. C/P folks where NTG Sprays are working get paste once pain free.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Why not carry NTG in a bottle and draw it up for slow bolus injection by syringe?

    No pumps, but it does require training the medics in the appropriate bolus dosing of NTG.

    Aren’t we already using bolus dosing? The sublingual absorption is a little slower, but giving the IV NTG as a slow IVP produces the same result.

    Should competent medics have any trouble doing this with appropriate education?

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Joebsimcox10,

    You encourage calling command, but your justification is a medical command doctor who burned you even though you called command?

    How did calling command (putting the monkey on someone else) help the doctor, help you or help the patient?

  • Pingback: What Comes First, the Nitro or the IV – A Day in the Life of an Ambulance Driver | Rogue Medic

  • Matt G

    Hee! I get to call AD an “Old Fart” all weekend long while we go hunting, next month.

    40lizard, as a friend of A.D.’s for the last 3+ years, I can tell you that he genuinely LOVES to teach, loves new students who are interested in his field, and is not derisive of someone for opening dialogue. He knows that there are several ways to skin a cat, and is just in search of the one that the safest, most practical, most achievable ways.
    Most importantly, he still likes to learn, still thinks of himself as young, and still has a way of joking in person, in a way that makes you think that you’ve just found an old buddy from college. (Hide yer wimmen!)

    Lotsa love, A.D.!

  • Yoda The Medic

    Well, I’m not sure why your medical director didn’t bust you for practicing medicine, which is what you did. Standing Medical Orders are just that, and giving 1.2 mg when your protocols call for 400 mcg would seem to be something a physician can do and a paramedic can’t.

    So, kids, as AD admits, he “got away with” ad libbing medical care. and doing so is really pretty reckless.

  • Yoda The Medic

    I realize it’s semantics I’m going to argue, but do you mean “technician” or “clinician”? Because when I think of (and teach) students, I see technician as “monkey-see, monkey-do” vs a chinician who looks at the patient and the situation and makes a treatment plan that is appropriate to this patient, his/her disease process here and now.

    Otherwise you get the stroke patients with a SBP of 190/110 getting atropine and paced because they have a heart rate in the 40′s with sinus bradycardia.

    Emergency Medical Clinician – Paramedic, anyone?

  • Yoda The Medic

    To quote Jerry Caesar: “Reverend, you’ve got balls as big as church bells”.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Whether it is practicing medicine depends on the way the state laws are written and the way the protocols are written.If the state laws are written in a way that prohibit deviation from protocol, then the state legislators are giving the medical orders (practicing medicine). If the protocols are written in a way that prohibit deviation from protocol, then maybe AD was practicing medicine. It is probably better to intubate these patients, than to provide appropriate care. After all, EMS exists to take care of the protocol and F*(# the patient.As AD pointed out, sometimes the medical director will learn from a demonstration of what is documented as the most appropriate medicine.Maybe the medical director did not consider this to be practicing medicine (without a medical license).In what way is providing the best treatment he has available reckless?We need to get medical directors to pay attention to what is good patient care. We should not behave like protocol monkeys.Great job, AD!

  • Anonymous

    That’s a fair criticism, Yoda.

    You may have the impression that I routinely flout protocols and make my own treatment decisions. I can certainly see why, based on this post and others I’ve made, but that is not really the case.

    On the other hand, I have demonstrated, throughout my 17-year career, a willingness to ignore protocols if the situation demanded it. Normally, one would make a phone call and consult with OLMC in that situation, and I encourage other EMTs to do just that.

    I have had the luxury of working in systems where I know all of the ER physicians, and we have a certain level of trust between us. Whether it be the small rural system where the ER docs and I hunt and fish together, or the mid-sized urban system where I may see an even dozen docs on a regular basis… we have a comfort zone. It’s with these docs that I feel comfortable omitting that step of consulting with OLMC.

    When I’m working an area where I don’t know the doctors personally, I am much less likely to do that – not because I’m any less sure of what is needed, but I’m less sure if the doc will bristle at me free-lancing. Few of the physicians I have regularly worked with ahve had an issue with any deviation from protocol I’ve made, provided I’ve been able to offer sound reasoning behind my decision. That has been the case even when their treatment approach has been different from my own. It’s also why I rarely have problems getting the orders I need via OLMC – I know what orders I want, and why.

    Still, there have been situations where I’ve nearly done something that I knew the patient needed, and I knew the OLMC physician wouldn’t have been able to protect me, even if he wanted. July 4, 1997 comes to mind. I remember thinking, as I was about to make the incision in a surgical cricothyrotomy, “It sure was nice being a paramedic. I wonder what I’ll do next?”

    At the time, surgical crics were a big no-no in Louisiana, but I truly felt the patient would die without it, and I was out of options. Luckily, I thought of another waaaaaaayyy outside the protocol option, and wound up securing the patient’s airway without the surgical cric.

    But I’d have made the cut if I had to, and been willing to accept the consequences.

  • Dan

    Why waste your time with Nitro Paste? Most of the time CHFers who are that critical usually have poor skin perfusion, which would mean the paste isn’t being absorbed at an adequate rate.

  • Yoda The Medic

    I appreciate the civil response. And although I’ve lost you for a while, I have read you over the years and I know you’re not a regular freelancer.

    I have a different perspective, working in a resource hospital where protocols are developed and medical oversight is provided. So protocols are not suggestions, they are standing orders.

    But Rogue is right, it depends on how the state law is written, or in my state, how our protocol policies (and cover page, which describes how they are to be used) read.

  • Yoda The Medic

    I guess I’m lucky. Our medical directors are all experienced emergency department physicians who are doing this because they love it. They stay on the cutting edge of medicine, and we develop protocols that are consistent with the standards of care in both EMS and the emergency department. I’m not sure I can envision a medical director in our EMS region learning from a paramedic, even someone with 17 (or more) 30 years of prehospital experience.

    Of course, our region had dozens of paramedics who think they are smarter than their medical directors. They are wrong, and universally full of both themselves and of crap.

  • Yoda The Medic

    Hey, even I know where the location of the STEMI is. It’s in the gallbladder, right?

  • Yoda The Medic

    Oh, and back to the IV or not. We changed that protocol about 10 years ago, so they can get one dose and then the IV has to be in place. But I was doing CE today and had a scenario with chest pain, a bradycardic patient with a borderline BP, who was taking two antihypertensives. The idea was not that you should NEVER EVER NEVER give this patient NTG without an IV, but that there were enough things about to make you think twice or even thrice about whether a call to Rampart for a quick consult would be beneficial to all.

  • Anonymous

    No, that’s a right shoulder STEMI, because of referred pain.

    No wait, now I’m confused. Maybe it’s a right shoulder STEMI that mimics a gallbladder attack.

    If only I had gone to nursing school instead, all this would make sense to me!

  • Anonymous

    Which is the essence of critical thinking and clinical decision-making, when it comes right down to it.

    There are very few hard and fast rules, and varying shades of gray. The astute clinician recognizes that, and isn’t afraid to seek input from others.

  • Anonymous

    I once wrote an EMS1 column on this subject, entitled “The Two Most Important Words in an EMS Protocol,” that adequately sum up my feelings on the subject. Rather than re-state them here, read that one if you haven’t already.

    Louisiana’s a bit different in that we don’t have resource hospitals. The system’s medical director sets the treatment protocols. The accepting physician at the receiving hospital is your de facto OLMC. If necessary, you may contact OLMC for further steps in your protocols that require direct orders, or permission to deviate from protocols or initiate treatment not specifically outlined within the protocol. As long as it’s within the statewide scope of practice, it’s kosher.

    I’d had occasions where OLMC docs ordered me to do something contrary to protocols. Most times, they’re just differences in approach to treatment, and as long as they were willing to sign off on the orders, I had no problem carrying them out. There have been rare occasions, however, when my OLMC orders not only contradicted my written protocols, but also defied common sense. In those situations, I respectfully (and on a couple of regrettable occasions, rather disrespectfully, but i was only echoing the doctor’s attitude) declined to carry out those orders.

    You’re right, though. There are plenty of medics out there who think they know better than the doctors. I’m not one of them, although I’ve been accused of it by people who don’t know me well. Those medics make us all look bad.

  • Crash

    I’m glad that you have such great doctors that have your back if you buck protocol, but not all of us have that. I haven’t been able to ride in a few years but when I did we had some terrible vindictive docs and nurses that would’ve reported us to our corporate AMR masters and we would’ve been fired.

    There was one time I rode with a medic who pulled off a spectacular trauma save by using the experimental fluid replacemant we had on our trucks for research. The patient didn’t quite fit the subject protocols but the medic used it anyway because our guy was in hypovolemic shock and the saline wasn’t cutting it. The patient made it because we bucked the protocol and we still got our asses chewed out by our OMD and given formal written warnings.

    When you get into an environment like that it makes you scared to do anything that goes against protocol, even if you know it’s the best thing for your patient.

  • usalsfyre

    Sorry for the delay in reply, strangely enough it’s actually been ADHF central around here lately, in the last 2 shifts I’ve hung NTG infusions on three occasions for this reason.

    We store our NTG wedged as tightly as possible in a cabinent. A can koozie actually helps with the breakage isseu, and the NTG fits nearly perfectly. Pumps are simply the dumb plumb pumps used by the ED of our base hospital. I’ve used minimeds at a previous job, however they are no longer a viable option due to Alaris discontinuing support. The Gemstars look interesting if you can afford to buy multiple pumps per truck, they’re small and I’ve head good reports of durability, as well as being a smart pump. In addition to NTG infusions we also carry enaliprat as an afterload reducing agent. This combo has worked very well for us so far, however is expensive.

    Rogue Medic, not a bad idea, but competent medics at times proves to be a problem nationwide.

  • JPINFV

    Yoda,

    I personally view the practice of prehospital care to be just about as close to practicing medicine as one can get outside of physicians and midlevels (NPs and PAs). It’s a field that, albeit much more rarely than advertised, decisions have to be made quickly. EMS protocols (where the underlying philosophy can vary from being a bible to a general guideline, even in a small geographic area. Links available on request) work for 95% of the population. However, I’d hope that paramedics are educated enough to understand when their patient’s individual situation falls outside of those guidelines and take action as appropriate. Sometimes that individual situation may dictate faster action than waiting a few minutes to get someone on the radio. Sometimes not. As such, understanding the underlying pathophysiology and the hows and whys of individual interventions are much more important than the actual number or steps on a protocol.

    My personal opinion (as someone who in a few short years will no longer bound by a legal scope of practice or protocols) is that any intervention taken by any provider should be done because that intervention is appropriate for that individual patient. 95% of the time the protocol should match the interventions provided not because the interventions were picked because of the protocol, but because the interventions were right for that patients and because the protocols represent the optimal plan for the majority of patients with that disease or disorder. EMS protocols can’t cover every situation, and this should be realized by everyone involved.

  • JPINFV

    I surely hope that this isn’t the case for two reasons. First off, if the person, regardless of education or health care level, is wrong, blatantly disregarding them loses a valuable teachable moment. Second, different experiences, educations, and perspectives can very easily lead to someone learning something new or an alternative way of proceeding. Most likely anything learned won’t be ground breaking information, but even the little tips and tricks can go a long way.

  • JPINFV

    Sometimes semantics are important, sometimes semantics are just that, semantics. I think the argument over license vs certificate is semantics (mostly because the terms are used interchangeably in California’s code covering physicians. Reference on request). However, the difference between a technician and a professional or the difference between a professional and a clinician are different because it’s also a mindset. Personally, I’d argue that the term “professional” would include the term “clinician” but not the term “technician.”

    Similarly, I 100% agree with your analysis of the difference between a technician and a professional/clinician. The problem I see with this, though, in terms of EMS is that there are plenty of providers (both at the EMT and paramedic level) who are perfectly happy being technicians and following their protocol cook book without thought or question. See A, do 1. See B, do 2. Never looking at the whole picture. Alternatively, there are plenty at both level who want to act as clinicians (acting within their scope of practice, of course. Hopefully realizing the limitations of their individual education). The problem is that you can’t design a system to cater to both sides of the coin. A technician paramedic in a clinician designed system is dangerous while a clinician paramedic in a technician designed system is going to become disgruntled, and most likely leave to another health care field (EMS brain drain, if you will). I’ll personally admit that if I was in a more clinician orientated area (I grew up and initially worked as an EMT during undergrad in Southern California. Major parts of So. Cal. are still living the glory days of Emergency! style of calling the base hospital for almost everything), it would have been a harder decision to not become a paramedic instead of pursuing medicine.

  • Too Old To Work

    Maybe, but your brain is definitely the smallest in the room.

  • Too Old To Work

    Tom, what are you calling “door to balloon” time? Maybe I have the wrong definition, but I think of it as from the second we hit the ER door until the balloon goes up in the cath lab.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Too Old To Work,

    I don’t think that Tom misunderstands Door to Balloon time.

    Nurse K had stated –

    If you’re in “city limits”, it’s not unusual to have a 911 call to balloon time of something like 15-20 minutes during regular business hours.

    Tom is just making it clear that from 911 call to balloon is going to take significantly longer than 15 – 20 minutes.

    Perhaps if the patient is right around the corner from the hospital and everything works perfectly, this time will work, but that would be something that I describe as unusual. Nurse K stated that this is not unusual.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Nurse K,

    The fastest door to balloon time we had was 8 minutes, not including patients who went directly to the cath lab c/o STEMI being called in the field.

    You are suggesting that a walk-in patient can get from the ED doors to the cath lab and have the balloon inflated in 8 minutes?

    From the way you worded this, you appear to be suggesting that prehospital STEMI alerts, who appropriately by-pass the ED, have even faster Door to Balloon times.

    I do know what the word means, but I think the relevant word is inconceivable.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    usalsfyre,

    There are many ways to treat patients using NTG. We just need to find the way(s) that work best in the prehospital setting. Carrying a bottle of Tridil and using 5 ml syringes to draw up 1 mg at a time (assuming a concentration of 200 mcg/ml) is just one way of delivering a slow IV push of NTG.

    Slow IV push vs. infusion? There is no reason to believe that this is a very important distinction.

    Is this more complicated to teach than intubation, which includes the essential when not to intubate? Or interpreting 12 lead ECGs?

    If the problem is a lack of competent medics, then I agree that NTG can be dangerous, but that applies to the NTG spray and tablets, too. Incompetent medics can be dangerous in so many ways that I could go on all day about the drugs we carry that an incompetent medic can use to injure, or kill, patients.

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    usalsfyre,

    There are many ways to treat patients using NTG. We just need to find the way(s) that work best in the prehospital setting. Carrying a bottle of Tridil and using 5 ml syringes to draw up 1 mg at a time (assuming a concentration of 200 mcg/ml) is just one way of delivering a slow IV push of NTG.

    Slow IV push vs. infusion? There is no reason to believe that this is a very important distinction.

    Is this more complicated to teach than intubation, which includes the essential when not to intubate? Or interpreting 12 lead ECGs?

    If the problem is a lack of competent medics, then I agree that NTG can be dangerous, but that applies to the NTG spray and tablets, too. Incompetent medics can be dangerous in so many ways that I could go on all day about the drugs we carry that an incompetent medic can use to injure, or kill, patients.

  • Anonymous

    I transport patients regularly to a couple of major hospitals with 24 hour cath labs, one of which is an accredited chest pain center.

    Even for them, a door-to-balloon time of 15 minutes or less is smokin’, even with the patient in their ER when the MI happens. It just takes longer than that.

  • http://twitter.com/FireMedic FireMedic

    If we can get medics to pull their collective heads out of their butts then maybe, just maybe, some MD out there will start expanding our protocols! Treat your patients, not the protocols!

  • usalsfyre

    I can’t say I disagree with you at all. Unfortunately the reality of the situation is there’s a large block of incompetent medics that no one wants to do anything about because of money, loyalty, absentee medical directors ect.

    I’m fortunate enough to work for an involved medical director that demands real continuing education, not rehashing paramedic school material over and over again. However I’m also aware that I’m one OMD change away from going back to kidergarten card class CE, like most of the nation does. Until we can ensure (paramedics, not states, the federal government, ect) that paramedics get a real education, both inital and continuing, a lot of new things (hell a lot of things we do NOW) will continue to make me nervous.

  • usalsfyre

    I can’t say I disagree with you at all. Unfortunately the reality of the situation is there’s a large block of incompetent medics that no one wants to do anything about because of money, loyalty, absentee medical directors ect.

    I’m fortunate enough to work for an involved medical director that demands real continuing education, not rehashing paramedic school material over and over again. However I’m also aware that I’m one OMD change away from going back to kidergarten card class CE, like most of the nation does. Until we can ensure (paramedics, not states, the federal government, ect) that paramedics get a real education, both inital and continuing, a lot of new things (hell a lot of things we do NOW) will continue to make me nervous.

  • Hortoncode3

    Here In Vermont, an action similar to that just got a medic fired. The reason for protocols is (a) you are NOT a DOC, and (b) Liability. Yeah yeah….you’re way smart, we get it..YEARS of experience and all that…got it. I appreciate it. Really. But you do work with a partner, who could have slipped a line post haste, with some re-direction form you, the ParaGod. And tah dah..the woman survives anyway.
    And you and your partner can go home secure in the knowledge that you still own it, instead of your patients family and their lawyers.

  • Anonymous

    Wrong. The reason for protocols is a) to establish a floor for competent medical care for the majority of medical conditions you may encounter. Period.

    But most protocols aren’t written that way. Most protocols establish a ceiling beyond which excellent care cannot rise. They make everybody average – including the medics who are above average.

    And as far as liability goes, when protocols are so restrictive that they fall far behind current medical standards, someone is liable. It may not be you, but it may certainly be your medical director. “I was just following orders” didn’t wash in the Nuremburg trials, although it may work for you in civil court. Still doesn’t abdicate your moral duty to do what is right for the patient.

    And when you’re working with an EMT-B partner, they can’t slip in a line for you. If you ask them to, then you’re involving them in your deviation from protocols, and asking them to exceed their scope of practice, to boot.

    My action in this case deviated from my protocols, but it did not exceed my scope of practice.

    On a final note, if you want to debate me here on my blog, I’m game. Ask any commenter her. But keep it civil. Don’t insult me or my commenters, and lose the snotty attitude, or you’ll be eating the Ban Hammer.

    You just got your one warning to be nice.

  • Bobball

    FWIW our pulmonary edema protocols specifically recommend triple-dosing NTG (we don’t carry IV NTG, very frew agencies in our system do). Really haven’t seen problems with this over the 7-8 years we’ve been doing it.

    As for locaing an MI based on 12-lead? AD, 2 other guys, and, oh, at least 116 or so at my agency (not counting the students riding with).

  • Bobball

    I see 2 different measurements being bandied aobut (beside’s Nurse K’s pencil). Door to Balloon and call to balloon.

    I’ve seen door to balloons in the 10 minute range occasionally (when everything is perfect). Call to balloon of 20 minutes? As Tom points out, even with a generous response time, you’re talking 25 minutes (and that’s considering only 4 minutes to package/move/treat the patient, 5 minutes to drive to the hospital, and 3 minutes to unload, get to the cath lab, and have the patient prepped, and ballooned. 911 call to balloon of <30 minutes is considered exemplary.

  • Pingback: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back | A Day In The Life Of An Ambulance Driver

  • Eileen

    Sadly that IV thing is fail-safe for docs insurance. People take their nitro alone all the time.

  • Memamedic

    I didn’t like this because it’ll give some medics reason to buck protocol. I knew a medic who lost certification for giving 2 doses of nitro without benefit of IV and the patient bottomed out. We have protocols for a reason and I seriously don’t admire medics who don’t follow them. If you don’t want to follow protocol, go to medical school and become the “God” you think you already are!

  • Anonymous

    It’s a free country. You have every right to be as wrong as you are.

    But by all means, let’s practice like trained monkeys and make patients fit the protocols, and never question when the protocol doesn’t fit the patient.

    Can’t have us medics thinking for themselves, oh no. That would be God-like.

    Stop me when the sarcasm gets high enough to register on you…

  • http://roguemedic.com/ Rogue Medic

    Memamedic,

    I didn’t like this because it’ll give some medics reason to buck protocol.

    Then maybe the medical directors need to write protocols better.

    I knew a medic who lost certification for giving 2 doses of nitro without benefit of IV and the patient bottomed out.

    Your anecdote is truly amazing. Occasionally, for non-CHF patients and rarely for dehydrated CHF patients, this will happen. Within 5 minutes, the pressure should return, except when the patient has an RVI. Checking for RVI is more important than having an IV.By the way, what difference would the presence of a patent IV have made?Protocols written by competent medical directors really do have provisions for deviation from protocol written into them. In patient care, anyone who thinks he/she is God is a danger to patients – especially if that person is writing restrictive EMS protocols and authorizing dangerous medics to treat patients.

  • Fred Savage

    26 years as a Paramedic in the field!! Love the stories!! triple squirt of Nitro!! Someone stole that out of my play book!!

  • Ibmules

    I’d like to add: Horse shit to this example of why its not necessary to have an IV while administering nitro. Whereas the OBVIOUS treatment of CHF here is O2, Nitro, (MS if you’ve got it) is correct, the indications for assisting with NTG or administering it for most protocols of chest pain however, definitely warrents an IV initiation concominently or pror to administration….particularly in the event that your MI patient is dehydrated or has right ventricular failure as the result of a right sided MI.

  • Anonymous

    To what example were you referring, the one in the original post, or the myriad examples in the comments?

    Having an IV while you’re administering Nitro is good practice. Requiring an IV before you administer Nitro is not.

    We should have protocols that ensure a minimum standard of care, while still allowing good medics to exercise judgment and critical thinking. Blanket protocols that say things like “You must initiate IV access prior to administering Nitroglycerin” may prevent an inferior medic from making a mistake, but they also ensure something else…

    mediocre care.

    Let’s do what is necessary to educate and field thinking medics, not protocol monkeys


Vote for me! Click Here

Polarized sunglasses, Flashlights, and Hiking boots.